Now, before some of you start yelling at me for getting it backwards, that
it is show, don’t tell, let me explain where I’m coming from. And yes, I meant it as the title says.
As writers there are few “rules” more powerful than show, don’t tell. From the first moment we crack open a writing
book, we are taught, informed, cajoled, ridiculed, and even bullied to SHOW
what is going on in our books. Never
tell. Telling bad. For such an offense a good smack on the nose
and an hour in the corner is often prescribed.
I say that’s not always the case. And many times writing can suffer if
someone worships at the house of Show, Don’t Tell too deeply.
There are always going to be times where telling is preferred to
showing. One of which is when the action
doesn’t need to be shown. TV is easier
to see for examples- so I’m going to use one from White Collar. Our hero Neil
and his sidekick are driving along when the sidekick sees someone he needs to
chase. We see Neil and sidekick running
a red light in pursuit. Then the scene
changes to the FBI buddy answering a phone, and going down to find the cops
have caught sidekick after running five red lights. And we’re told he did that.
Now, did we need to see all five lights being run? No, there was one, with witty banter, and it
was enough. The same could be said for
writing, we don’t always need to see what happened, especially if there are
multiple viewpoints, or it makes for a stronger story to end the scene- then
cut to a new scene where the character wraps up the repetitive action. The telling actually makes the scene
stronger.
Another time telling is better than showing is when it’s an action the
average reader has done before. I’ve been a judge in various writing contests
for a few years, and I often see this in the “younger” manuscripts. A step by step paragraph of the character
getting to, unlocking, getting in to, and starting their car. Including shifting gears. Sometimes these chunks last more than one
paragraph. Those authors may be proud
they are showing us what happened, but it’s boring, wordy, and slows your
pace. A simple, “She went to her car and
drove to the store.” Gets it across.
Unless there is something new and unique about the action, you don’t
need to show it to us. TELL us.
I view the telling times as a point where the author is saying, “Ok, this
isn’t crucial, but it is what happened.
I’m telling you so you know, but what I really want you to focus on is
THIS!” (This being the good stuff that
is new, exciting, and moves the character arc and plot forward.)
We all need to be aware of times in our writing where we don’t need to
show, where telling might work faster and cleaner to get the job done.
Hallelujah, Sista! You're absolutely right. And I'm so pleased you put 'Rules' like that. They're guidelines, to be carefully considered, and ignored if they don't work.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Greta :). Very well put, sometimes they guide us towards better writing-- other times they can lead us off a cliff.
DeleteThanks for coming by and commenting!
I SECOND THAT - Someone finally said it besides me. Coming from a long line of story tellers I strongly believe there are times to tell and of course times to show. Thanks for posting. This was one of the best blogs I've read in a long time.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much, Virginia! If enough of us say it, maybe folks will eventually believe it.
DeleteI'm glad you enjoyed the blog post. Thank you for coming by and commenting
You are telling it like it is, girl. No pictures needed. Many an hour has been wasted by strict followers of Show while walking the walk down the broad, meandering and picturesque Show Me Avenue.
ReplyDeleteAs Inigo Montoya said, "Let me explain. No, there is too much. Let me sum up."
Great post.
Sharon
LOL!!! Anytime a line from the Princess Bride can be used, it's a good thing ;).
DeleteThank you, Sharon, I like the image of the Show folks meandering :).
Thanks for coming by and commenting.
So true. Read a couple of GH entries today and they both suffered from showing-unimportant-details disease. Seriously slowed the pace.
ReplyDeleteLOL! Maybe there should be a warning out there about this dreadful disease. "Do you find yourself describing EVERYTHING your charactor does? You may have SUD! Seek professional assistance immediately!"
DeleteI like it :)
Thanks for coming by and commenting, Shoshana!
Amen! There are times when telling IS better than showing. When reading all those classics, well-loved children books for our childhood and so on, the authors DO tell and the books are still good/great. I think it's like everything else -- all in good proportion :)
ReplyDeleteVery true, T! I think even modern books have far more telling than the writing gurus would deem proper ;).
DeleteThanks for coming by and commenting!
YES! It's about time someone said this. Thanks, Marie!
ReplyDeleteLOL! Glad I could be of service, Juli :). I think we all need to chase the "thou shall nots" out of writing. Understand what works, understand when not to follow that concept off a cliff ;).
DeleteThanks for coming by and commenting!
Yes! I'm always heartened when I see a post about Telling being okay, as long as you do it in moderation. Most of the books I enjoy have lots of telling and it's difficult for me to take it out of my writing.
ReplyDeleteJames Scott Bell suggests assigning your sentences a value of 1 to 10, with 1 being deadly dull (and probably shouldn't be in the book) and 10 being over the top exciting. Anything assigned 5 or less should just be told or you're wasting the reader's time.
:) Glad I could help, Ken! I love James Scott Bell- and that is a great bit of info with the sentance value.
DeleteThanks for commenting!
Marie- at work- can't log on to blogger :(